Authorization Services

Version 22.0.5

Authorization services overview

Edit this section Report an issue

Keycloak supports fine-grained authorization policies and is able to combine different access control mechanisms such as:

  • Attribute-based access control (ABAC)

  • Role-based access control (RBAC)

  • User-based access control (UBAC)

  • Context-based access control (CBAC)

  • Rule-based access control

    • Using JavaScript

  • Time-based access control

  • Support for custom access control mechanisms (ACMs) through a Service Provider Interface (SPI)

Keycloak is based on a set of administrative UIs and a RESTful API, and provides the necessary means to create permissions for your protected resources and scopes, associate those permissions with authorization policies, and enforce authorization decisions in your applications and services.

Resource servers (applications or services serving protected resources) usually rely on some kind of information to decide if access should be granted to a protected resource. For RESTful-based resource servers, that information is usually obtained from a security token, usually sent as a bearer token on every request to the server. For web applications that rely on a session to authenticate users, that information is usually stored in a user’s session and retrieved from there for each request.

Frequently, resource servers only perform authorization decisions based on role-based access control (RBAC), where the roles granted to the user trying to access protected resources are checked against the roles mapped to these same resources. While roles are very useful and used by applications, they also have a few limitations:

  • Resources and roles are tightly coupled and changes to roles (such as adding, removing, or changing an access context) can impact multiple resources

  • Changes to your security requirements can imply deep changes to application code to reflect these changes

  • Depending on your application size, role management might become difficult and error-prone

  • It is not the most flexible access control mechanism. Roles do not represent who you are and lack contextual information. If you have been granted a role, you have at least some access.

Considering that today we need to consider heterogeneous environments where users are distributed across different regions, with different local policies, using different devices, and with a high demand for information sharing, Keycloak Authorization Services can help you improve the authorization capabilities of your applications and services by providing:

  • Resource protection using fine-grained authorization policies and different access control mechanisms

  • Centralized Resource, Permission, and Policy Management

  • Centralized Policy Decision Point

  • REST security based on a set of REST-based authorization services

  • Authorization workflows and User-Managed Access

  • The infrastructure to help avoid code replication across projects (and redeploys) and quickly adapt to changes in your security requirements.

Architecture

Edit this section Report an issue

Keycloak AuthZ architecture overview

From a design perspective, Authorization Services is based on a well-defined set of authorization patterns providing these capabilities:

  • Policy Administration Point (PAP)

    Provides a set of UIs based on the Keycloak Administration Console to manage resource servers, resources, scopes, permissions, and policies. Part of this is also accomplished remotely through the use of the Protection API.

  • Policy Decision Point (PDP)

    Provides a distributable policy decision point to where authorization requests are sent and policies are evaluated accordingly with the permissions being requested. For more information, see Obtaining Permissions.

  • Policy Enforcement Point (PEP)

    Provides implementations for different environments to actually enforce authorization decisions at the resource server side. Keycloak provides some built-in Policy Enforcers.

  • Policy Information Point (PIP)

    Being based on Keycloak Authentication Server, you can obtain attributes from identities and runtime environment during the evaluation of authorization policies.

The authorization process

Three main processes define the necessary steps to understand how to use Keycloak to enable fine-grained authorization to your applications:

  • Resource Management

  • Permission and Policy Management

  • Policy Enforcement

Resource management

Resource Management involves all the necessary steps to define what is being protected.

Resource management overview

First, you need to specify Keycloak what are you looking to protect, which usually represents a web application or a set of one or more services. For more information on resource servers see Terminology.

Resource servers are managed using the Keycloak Administration Console. There you can enable any registered client application as a resource server and start managing the resources and scopes you want to protect.

Resource Server overview

A resource can be a web page, a RESTFul resource, a file in your file system, an EJB, and so on. They can represent a group of resources (just like a Class in Java) or they can represent a single and specific resource.

For instance, you might have a Bank Account resource that represents all banking accounts and use it to define the authorization policies that are common to all banking accounts. However, you might want to define specific policies for Alice Account (a resource instance that belongs to a customer), where only the owner is allowed to access some information or perform an operation.

Resources can be managed using the Keycloak Administration Console or the Protection API. In the latter case, resource servers are able to manage their resources remotely.

Scopes usually represent the actions that can be performed on a resource, but they are not limited to that. You can also use scopes to represent one or more attributes within a resource.

Permission and policy management

Once you have defined your resource server and all the resources you want to protect, you must set up permissions and policies.

This process involves all the necessary steps to actually define the security and access requirements that govern your resources.

Permission and policy management overview

Policies define the conditions that must be satisfied to access or perform operations on something (resource or scope), but they are not tied to what they are protecting. They are generic and can be reused to build permissions or even more complex policies.

For instance, to allow access to a group of resources only for users granted with a role "User Premium", you can use RBAC (Role-based Access Control).

Keycloak provides a few built-in policy types (and their respective policy providers) covering the most common access control mechanisms. You can even create policies based on rules written using JavaScript.

Once you have your policies defined, you can start defining your permissions. Permissions are coupled with the resource they are protecting. Here you specify what you want to protect (resource or scope) and the policies that must be satisfied to grant or deny permission.

Policy enforcement

Policy Enforcement involves the necessary steps to actually enforce authorization decisions to a resource server. This is achieved by enabling a Policy Enforcement Point or PEP at the resource server that is capable of communicating with the authorization server, ask for authorization data and control access to protected resources based on the decisions and permissions returned by the server.

PEP overview

Keycloak provides some built-in Policy Enforcers implementations that you can use to protect your applications depending on the platform they are running on.

Authorization services

Authorization services consist of the following RESTFul endpoints:

  • Token Endpoint

  • Resource Management Endpoint

  • Permission Management Endpoint

Each of these services provides a specific API covering the different steps involved in the authorization process.

Token endpoint

OAuth2 clients (such as front end applications) can obtain access tokens from the server using the token endpoint and use these same tokens to access resources protected by a resource server (such as back end services). In the same way, Keycloak Authorization Services provide extensions to OAuth2 to allow access tokens to be issued based on the processing of all policies associated with the resource(s) or scope(s) being requested. This means that resource servers can enforce access to their protected resources based on the permissions granted by the server and held by an access token. In Keycloak Authorization Services the access token with permissions is called a Requesting Party Token or RPT for short.

Additional resources
Protection API

The Protection API is a set of UMA-compliant endpoint-providing operations for resource servers to help them manage their resources, scopes, permissions, and policies associated with them. Only resource servers are allowed to access this API, which also requires a uma_protection scope.

The operations provided by the Protection API can be organized in two main groups:

  • Resource Management

    • Create Resource

    • Delete Resource

    • Find by Id

    • Query

  • Permission Management

    • Issue Permission Tickets

By default, Remote Resource Management is enabled. You can change that using the Keycloak Administration Console and only allow resource management through the console.

When using the UMA protocol, the issuance of Permission Tickets by the Protection API is an important part of the whole authorization process. As described in a subsequent section, they represent the permissions being requested by the client and that are sent to the server to obtain a final token with all permissions granted during the evaluation of the permissions and policies associated with the resources and scopes being requested.

Additional resources

Terminology

Edit this section Report an issue

Before going further, it is important to understand these terms and concepts introduced by Keycloak Authorization Services.

Resource Server

Per OAuth2 terminology, a resource server is the server hosting the protected resources and capable of accepting and responding to protected resource requests.

Resource servers usually rely on some kind of information to decide whether access to a protected resource should be granted. For RESTful-based resource servers, that information is usually carried in a security token, typically sent as a bearer token along with every request to the server. Web applications that rely on a session to authenticate users usually store that information in the user’s session and retrieve it from there for each request.

In Keycloak, any confidential client application can act as a resource server. This client’s resources and their respective scopes are protected and governed by a set of authorization policies.

Resource

A resource is part of the assets of an application and the organization. It can be a set of one or more endpoints, a classic web resource such as an HTML page, and so on. In authorization policy terminology, a resource is the object being protected.

Every resource has a unique identifier that can represent a single resource or a set of resources. For instance, you can manage a Banking Account Resource that represents and defines a set of authorization policies for all banking accounts. But you can also have a different resource named Alice’s Banking Account, which represents a single resource owned by a single customer, which can have its own set of authorization policies.

Scope

A resource’s scope is a bounded extent of access that is possible to perform on a resource. In authorization policy terminology, a scope is one of the potentially many verbs that can logically apply to a resource.

It usually indicates what can be done with a given resource. Example of scopes are view, edit, delete, and so on. However, scope can also be related to specific information provided by a resource. In this case, you can have a project resource and a cost scope, where the cost scope is used to define specific policies and permissions for users to access a project’s cost.

Permission

Consider this simple and very common permission:

A permission associates the object being protected with the policies that must be evaluated to determine whether access is granted.

  • X CAN DO Y ON RESOURCE Z

    • where …​

      • X represents one or more users, roles, or groups, or a combination of them. You can also use claims and context here.

      • Y represents an action to be performed, for example, write, view, and so on.

      • Z represents a protected resource, for example, "/accounts".

Keycloak provides a rich platform for building a range of permission strategies ranging from simple to very complex, rule-based dynamic permissions. It provides flexibility and helps to:

  • Reduce code refactoring and permission management costs

  • Support a more flexible security model, helping you to easily adapt to changes in your security requirements

  • Make changes at runtime; applications are only concerned about the resources and scopes being protected and not how they are protected.

Policy

A policy defines the conditions that must be satisfied to grant access to an object. Unlike permissions, you do not specify the object being protected but rather the conditions that must be satisfied for access to a given object (for example, resource, scope, or both). Policies are strongly related to the different access control mechanisms (ACMs) that you can use to protect your resources. With policies, you can implement strategies for attribute-based access control (ABAC), role-based access control (RBAC), context-based access control, or any combination of these.

Keycloak leverages the concept of policies and how you define them by providing the concept of aggregated policies, where you can build a "policy of policies" and still control the behavior of the evaluation. Instead of writing one large policy with all the conditions that must be satisfied for access to a given resource, the policies implementation in Keycloak Authorization Services follows the divide-and-conquer technique. That is, you can create individual policies, then reuse them with different permissions and build more complex policies by combining individual policies.

Policy provider

Policy providers are implementations of specific policy types. Keycloak provides built-in policies, backed by their corresponding policy providers, and you can create your own policy types to support your specific requirements.

Keycloak provides an SPI (Service Provider Interface) that you can use to plug in your own policy provider implementations.

Permission ticket

A permission ticket is a special type of token defined by the User-Managed Access (UMA) specification that provides an opaque structure whose form is determined by the authorization server. This structure represents the resources and/or scopes being requested by a client, the access context, as well as the policies that must be applied to a request for authorization data (requesting party token [RPT]).

In UMA, permission tickets are crucial to support person-to-person sharing and also person-to-organization sharing. Using permission tickets for authorization workflows enables a range of scenarios from simple to complex, where resource owners and resource servers have complete control over their resources based on fine-grained policies that govern the access to these resources.

In the UMA workflow, permission tickets are issued by the authorization server to a resource server, which returns the permission ticket to the client trying to access a protected resource. Once the client receives the ticket, it can make a request for an RPT (a final token holding authorization data) by sending the ticket back to the authorization server.

For more information on permission tickets, see User-Managed Access and the UMA specification.

Getting Started

Edit this section Report an issue

If you are using Wildfly, Spring Boot, or Quarkus, you can look at the following quickstarts and documentation to quickly get started with Keycloak Authorization Services:

Managing resource servers

Edit this section Report an issue

According to the OAuth2 specification, a resource server is a server hosting the protected resources and capable of accepting and responding to protected resource requests.

In Keycloak, resource servers are provided with a rich platform for enabling fine-grained authorization for their protected resources, where authorization decisions can be made based on different access control mechanisms.

Any client application can be configured to support fine-grained permissions. In doing so, you are conceptually turning the client application into a resource server.

Creating a client application

Edit this section Report an issue

The first step to enable Keycloak Authorization Services is to create the client application that you want to turn into a resource server.

Procedure

  1. Click Clients.

    Clients

    Clients

  2. On this page, click Create client.

    Add Client

    Add Client

  3. Type the Client ID of the client. For example, my-resource-server.

  4. Click Next.

  5. Toggle Client authentication to ON.

  6. Click Save.

  7. Type the Root URL for your application. For example:

    http://${host}:${port}/my-resource-server

  8. Click Save. The client is created and the client Settings page opens. A page similar to the following is displayed:

    Client Settings

    Client Settings

Enabling authorization services

Edit this section Report an issue

You can turn your OIDC client into a resource server and enable fine-grained authorization.

Procedure

  1. Toggle Authorization Enabled to `On.

  2. Click Save.

    Enabling authorization services

    Enabling authorization services

    A new Authorization tab is displayed for this client. Click the Authorization tab and a page similar to the following is displayed:

    Resource server settings

    Resource server settings

The Authorization tab contains additional sub-tabs covering the different steps that you must follow to actually protect your application’s resources. Each tab is covered separately by a specific topic in this documentation. But here is a quick description about each one:

  • Settings

    General settings for your resource server. For more details about this page see the Resource Server Settings section.

  • Resource

    From this page, you can manage your application’s resources.

  • Authorization Scopes

    From this page, you can manage scopes.

  • Policies

    From this page, you can manage authorization policies and define the conditions that must be met to grant a permission.

  • Permissions

    From this page, you can manage the permissions for your protected resources and scopes by linking them with the policies you created.

  • Evaluate

    From this page, you can simulate authorization requests and view the result of the evaluation of the permissions and authorization policies you have defined.

  • Export Settings

    From this page, you can export the authorization settings to a JSON file.

Resource server settings

On the Resource Server Settings page, you can configure the policy enforcement mode, allow remote resource management, and export the authorization configuration settings.

  • Policy Enforcement Mode

    Specifies how policies are enforced when processing authorization requests sent to the server.

    • Enforcing

      (default mode) Requests are denied by default even when there is no policy associated with a given resource.

    • Permissive

      Requests are allowed even when there is no policy associated with a given resource.

    • Disabled

      Disables the evaluation of all policies and allows access to all resources.

  • Decision Strategy

    This configurations changes how the policy evaluation engine decides whether or not a resource or scope should be granted based on the outcome from all evaluated permissions. Affirmative means that at least one permission must evaluate to a positive decision in order grant access to a resource and its scopes. Unanimous means that all permissions must evaluate to a positive decision in order for the final decision to be also positive. As an example, if two permissions for a same resource or scope are in conflict (one of them is granting access and the other is denying access), the permission to the resource or scope will be granted if the chosen strategy is Affirmative. Otherwise, a single deny from any permission will also deny access to the resource or scope.

  • Remote Resource Management

    Specifies whether resources can be managed remotely by the resource server. If false, resources can be managed only from the administration console.

Default Configuration

Edit this section Report an issue

When you create a resource server, Keycloak creates a default configuration for your newly created resource server.

The default configuration consists of:

  • A default protected resource representing all resources in your application.

  • A policy that always grants access to the resources protected by this policy.

  • A permission that governs access to all resources based on the default policy.

The default protected resource is referred to as the default resource and you can view it if you navigate to the Resources tab.

Default resource

Default resource

This resource defines a Type, namely urn:my-resource-server:resources:default and a URI /*. Here, the URI field defines a wildcard pattern that indicates to Keycloak that this resource represents all the paths in your application. In other words, when enabling policy enforcement for your application, all the permissions associated with the resource will be examined before granting access.

The Type mentioned previously defines a value that can be used to create typed resource permissions that must be applied to the default resource or any other resource you create using the same type.

The default policy is referred to as the only from realm policy and you can view it if you navigate to the Policies tab.

Default policy

Default policy

This policy is a JavaScript-based policy defining a condition that always grants access to the resources protected by this policy. If you click this policy you can see that it defines a rule as follows:

// by default, grants any permission associated with this policy
$evaluation.grant();

Lastly, the default permission is referred to as the default permission and you can view it if you navigate to the Permissions tab.

Default Permission

Default Permission

This permission is a resource-based permission, defining a set of one or more policies that are applied to all resources with a given type.

Changing the default configuration

You can change the default configuration by removing the default resource, policy, or permission definitions and creating your own.

The default resource is created with a URI that maps to any resource or path in your application using a /* pattern. Before creating your own resources, permissions and policies, make sure the default configuration doesn’t conflict with your own settings.

The default configuration defines a resource that maps to all paths in your application. If you are about to write permissions to your own resources, be sure to remove the Default Resource or change its URIS fields to a more specific paths in your application. Otherwise, the policy associated with the default resource (which by default always grants access) will allow Keycloak to grant access to any protected resource.

Export and import authorization configuration

Edit this section Report an issue

The configuration settings for a resource server (or client) can be exported and downloaded. You can also import an existing configuration file for a resource server. Importing and exporting a configuration file is helpful when you want to create an initial configuration for a resource server or to update an existing configuration. The configuration file contains definitions for:

  • Protected resources and scopes

  • Policies

  • Permissions

Exporting a configuration file

Procedure

  1. Click Clients in the menu.

  2. Click the client you created as a resource server.

  3. Click the Export tab.

    Export Settings

    Export Settings

The configuration file is exported in JSON format and displayed in a text area, from which you can copy and paste. You can also click Download to download the configuration file and save it.

Importing a configuration file

You can import a configuration file for a resource server.

Procedure

  1. Navigate to the Resource Server Settings page.

    Import Settings

    Import Settings

  2. Click Import and choose a file containing the configuration that you want to import.

Managing resources and scopes

Edit this section Report an issue

Resource management is straightforward and generic. After creating a resource server, you can start creating the resources and scopes that you want to protect. Resources and scopes can be managed by navigating to the Resource and Authorization Scopes tabs, respectively.

Viewing resources

Edit this section Report an issue

On the Resource page, you see a list of the resources associated with a resource server.

Resources

Resources

The resource list provides information about the protected resources, such as:

  • Type

  • URIS

  • Owner

  • Associated scopes, if any

  • Associated permissions

From this list, you can also directly create a permission by clicking Create Permission for the resource for which you want to create the permission.

Before creating permissions for your resources, be sure you have already defined the policies that you want to associate with the permission.

Creating resources

Edit this section Report an issue

Creating a resource is straightforward and generic. Your main concern is the granularity of the resources you create. In other words, resources can be created to represent a set of one or more resources and the way you define them is crucial to managing permissions.

To create a new resource, click Create resource.

Add resource

Add resource

In Keycloak, a resource defines a small set of information that is common to different types of resources, such as:

  • Name

    A human-readable and unique string describing this resource.

  • Type

    A string uniquely identifying the type of a set of one or more resources. The type is a string used to group different resource instances. For example, the default type for the default resource that is automatically created is urn:resource-server-name:resources:default

  • URIS

    URIS that provides the locations/addresses for the resource. For HTTP resources, the URIS are usually the relative paths used to serve these resources.

  • Scopes

    One or more scopes to associate with the resource.

Resource attributes

Resources may have attributes associated with them. These attributes can be used to provide additional information about a resource and to provide additional information to policies when evaluating permissions associated with a resource.

Each attribute is a key and value pair where the value can be a set of one or many strings. Multiple values can be defined for an attribute by separating each value with a comma.

Typed resources

The type field of a resource can be used to group different resources together, so they can be protected using a common set of permissions.

Resource owners

Resources also have an owner. By default, resources are owned by the resource server.

However, resources can also be associated with users, so you can create permissions based on the resource owner. For example, only the resource owner is allowed to delete or update a given resource.

Managing resources remotely

Resource management is also exposed through the Protection API to allow resource servers to remotely manage their resources.

When using the Protection API, resource servers can be implemented to manage resources owned by their users. In this case, you can specify the user identifier to configure a resource as belonging to a specific user.

Keycloak provides resource servers complete control over their resources. In the future, we should be able to allow users to control their own resources as well as approve authorization requests and manage permissions, especially when using the UMA protocol.

Managing policies

Edit this section Report an issue

As mentioned previously, policies define the conditions that must be satisfied before granting access to an object.

Procedure

  1. Click the Policy tab to view all policies associated with a resource server.

    Policies

    Policies

    On this tab, you can view the list of previously created policies as well as create and edit a policy.

To create a new policy, click Create policy, then select a policy type from the list.

Details about each policy type are described in this section.

User-based policy

Edit this section Report an issue

You can use this type of policy to define conditions for your permissions where a set of one or more users is permitted to access an object.

To create a new user-based policy, select User in the item list in the upper right corner of the policy listing.

Add a User Policy

Add User Policy

Configuration

  • Name

    A human-readable and unique string identifying the policy. A best practice is to use names that are closely related to your business and security requirements, so you can identify them more easily.

  • Description

    A string containing details about this policy.

  • Users

    Specifies which users are given access by this policy.

  • Logic

    The logic of this policy to apply after the other conditions have been evaluated.

Additional resources

Role-based policy

Edit this section Report an issue

You can use this type of policy to define conditions for your permissions where a set of one or more roles is permitted to access an object.

By default, roles added to this policy are not specified as required and the policy will grant access if the user requesting access has been granted any of these roles. However, you can specify a specific role as required if you want to enforce a specific role. You can also combine required and non-required roles, regardless of whether they are realm or client roles.

Role policies can be useful when you need more restricted role-based access control (RBAC), where specific roles must be enforced to grant access to an object. For instance, you can enforce that a user must consent to allowing a client application (which is acting on the user’s behalf) to access the user’s resources. You can use Keycloak Client Scope Mapping to enable consent pages or even enforce clients to explicitly provide a scope when obtaining access tokens from a Keycloak server.

To create a new role-based policy, select Role from the policy type list.

Add Role Policy

Add Role Policy

Configuration

  • Name

    A human-readable and unique string describing the policy. A best practice is to use names that are closely related to your business and security requirements, so you can identify them more easily.

  • Description

    A string containing details about this policy.

  • Realm Roles

    Specifies which realm roles are permitted by this policy.

  • Client Roles

    Specifies which client roles are permitted by this policy. To enable this field must first select a Client.

  • Logic

    The logic of this policy to apply after the other conditions have been evaluated.

Additional resources

Defining a role as required

Edit this section Report an issue

When creating a role-based policy, you can specify a specific role as Required. When you do that, the policy will grant access only if the user requesting access has been granted all the required roles. Both realm and client roles can be configured as such.

Example of a required role

Example of a required role

To specify a role as required, select the Required checkbox for the role you want to configure as required.

Required roles can be useful when your policy defines multiple roles but only a subset of them are mandatory. In this case, you can combine realm and client roles to enable an even more fine-grained role-based access control (RBAC) model for your application. For example, you can have policies specific for a client and require a specific client role associated with that client. Or you can enforce that access is granted only in the presence of a specific realm role. You can also combine both approaches within the same policy.

JavaScript-based policy

Edit this section Report an issue
If your policy implementation is using Attribute based access control (ABAC) as in the examples below, then please make sure that users are not able to edit the protected attributes and the corresponding attributes are read-only. See the details in the Threat model mitigation chapter.

You can use this type of policy to define conditions for your permissions using JavaScript. It is one of the rule-based policy types supported by Keycloak, and provides flexibility to write any policy based on the Evaluation API.

To create a new JavaScript-based policy, select JavaScript in the item list in the upper right corner of the policy listing.

By default, JavaScript Policies can not be uploaded to the server. You should prefer deploying your JS Policies directly to the server as described in JavaScript Providers.

Creating a JS policy from a deployed JAR file

Keycloak allows you to deploy a JAR file in order to deploy scripts to the server. Please, take a look at JavaScript Providers for more details.

Once you have your scripts deployed, you should be able to select the scripts you deployed from the list of available policy providers.

Examples

Checking for attributes from the evaluation context

Here is a simple example of a JavaScript-based policy that uses attribute-based access control (ABAC) to define a condition based on an attribute obtained from the execution context:

const context = $evaluation.getContext();
const contextAttributes = context.getAttributes();

if (contextAttributes.containsValue('kc.client.network.ip_address', '127.0.0.1')) {
    $evaluation.grant();
}
Checking for attributes from the current identity

Here is a simple example of a JavaScript-based policy that uses attribute-based access control (ABAC) to define a condition based on an attribute obtained associated with the current identity:

const context = $evaluation.getContext();
const identity = context.getIdentity();
const attributes = identity.getAttributes();
const email = attributes.getValue('email').asString(0);

if (email.endsWith('@keycloak.org')) {
    $evaluation.grant();
}

Where these attributes are mapped from whatever claim is defined in the token that was used in the authorization request.

Checking for roles granted to the current identity

You can also use Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) in your policies. In the example below, we check if a user is granted with a keycloak_user realm role:

const context = $evaluation.getContext();
const identity = context.getIdentity();

if (identity.hasRealmRole('keycloak_user')) {
    $evaluation.grant();
}

Or you can check if a user is granted with a my-client-role client role, where my-client is the client id of the client application:

const context = $evaluation.getContext();
const identity = context.getIdentity();

if (identity.hasClientRole('my-client', 'my-client-role')) {
    $evaluation.grant();
}
Checking for roles granted to a user

To check for realm roles granted to a user:

const realm = $evaluation.getRealm();

if (realm.isUserInRealmRole('marta', 'role-a')) {
    $evaluation.grant();
}

Or for client roles granted to a user:

const realm = $evaluation.getRealm();

if (realm.isUserInClientRole('marta', 'my-client', 'some-client-role')) {
    $evaluation.grant();
}
Checking for roles granted to a group

To check for realm roles granted to a group:

const realm = $evaluation.getRealm();

if (realm.isGroupInRole('/Group A/Group D', 'role-a')) {
    $evaluation.grant();
}
Pushing arbitrary claims to the resource server

To push arbitrary claims to the resource server in order to provide additional information on how permissions should be enforced:

const permission = $evaluation.getPermission();

// decide if permission should be granted

if (granted) {
    permission.addClaim('claim-a', 'claim-a');
    permission.addClaim('claim-a', 'claim-a1');
    permission.addClaim('claim-b', 'claim-b');
}
Checking for group membership
const realm = $evaluation.getRealm();

if (realm.isUserInGroup('marta', '/Group A/Group B')) {
    $evaluation.grant();
}
Mixing different access control mechanisms

You can also use a combination of several access control mechanisms. The example below shows how roles(RBAC) and claims/attributes(ABAC) checks can be used within the same policy. In this case we check if user is granted with admin role or has an e-mail from keycloak.org domain:

const context = $evaluation.getContext();
const identity = context.getIdentity();
const attributes = identity.getAttributes();
const email = attributes.getValue('email').asString(0);

if (identity.hasRealmRole('admin') || email.endsWith('@keycloak.org')) {
    $evaluation.grant();
}
When writing your own rules, keep in mind that the $evaluation object is an object implementing org.keycloak.authorization.policy.evaluation.Evaluation. For more information about what you can access from this interface, see the Evaluation API.

Time-based policy

Edit this section Report an issue

You can use this type of policy to define time conditions for your permissions.

To create a new time-based policy, select Time in the item list in the upper right corner of the policy listing.

Add Time Policy

Add Time Policy

Configuration

  • Name

    A human-readable and unique string describing the policy. A best practice is to use names that are closely related to your business and security requirements, so you can identify them more easily.

  • Description

    A string containing details about this policy.

  • Start time

    Defines the time before which access must not be granted. Permission is granted only if the current date/time is later than or equal to this value.

  • Expire time

    Defines the time after which access must not be granted. Permission is granted only if the current date/time is earlier than or equal to this value. Select Repeat to repeat access being granted on a specific Day of Month, Month, Year, Hour or Minute.

  • Day of Month

    Defines the day of month that access must be granted. You can also specify a range of dates. In this case, permission is granted only if the current day of the month is between or equal to the two values specified.

  • Month

    Defines the month that access must be granted. You can also specify a range of months. In this case, permission is granted only if the current month is between or equal to the two values specified.

  • Year

    Defines the year that access must be granted. You can also specify a range of years. In this case, permission is granted only if the current year is between or equal to the two values specified.

  • Hour

    Defines the hour that access must be granted. You can also specify a range of hours. In this case, permission is granted only if current hour is between or equal to the two values specified.

  • Minute

    Defines the minute that access must be granted. You can also specify a range of minutes. In this case, permission is granted only if the current minute is between or equal to the two values specified.

  • Logic

    The logic of this policy to apply after the other conditions have been evaluated.

Access is only granted if all conditions are satisfied. Keycloak will perform an AND based on the outcome of each condition.

Additional resources

Aggregated policy

Edit this section Report an issue

As mentioned previously, Keycloak allows you to build a policy of policies, a concept referred to as policy aggregation. You can use policy aggregation to reuse existing policies to build more complex ones and keep your permissions even more decoupled from the policies that are evaluated during the processing of authorization requests.

To create a new aggregated policy, select Aggregated from the policy type list.

Add an aggregated policy

Add aggregated policy

Let’s suppose you have a resource called Confidential Resource that can be accessed only by users from the keycloak.org domain and from a certain range of IP addresses. You can create a single policy with both conditions. However, you want to reuse the domain part of this policy to apply to permissions that operates regardless of the originating network.

You can create separate policies for both domain and network conditions and create a third policy based on the combination of these two policies. With an aggregated policy, you can freely combine other policies and then apply the new aggregated policy to any permission you want.

When creating aggregated policies, be mindful that you are not introducing a circular reference or dependency between policies. If a circular dependency is detected, you cannot create or update the policy.

Configuration

  • Name

    A human-readable and unique string describing the policy. We strongly suggest that you use names that are closely related with your business and security requirements, so you can identify them more easily and also know what they mean.

  • Description

    A string with more details about this policy.

  • Apply Policy

    Defines a set of one or more policies to associate with the aggregated policy. To associate a policy you can either select an existing policy or create a new one by selecting the type of the policy you want to create.

  • Decision Strategy

    The decision strategy for this permission.

  • Logic

    The logic of this policy to apply after the other conditions have been evaluated.

Additional resources

Decision strategy for aggregated policies

When creating aggregated policies, you can also define the decision strategy that will be used to determine the final decision based on the outcome from each policy.

  • Unanimous

    The default strategy if none is provided. In this case, all policies must evaluate to a positive decision for the final decision to be also positive.

  • Affirmative

    In this case, at least one policy must evaluate to a positive decision in order for the final decision to be also positive.

  • Consensus

    In this case, the number of positive decisions must be greater than the number of negative decisions. If the number of positive and negative decisions is the same, the final decision will be negative.

Client-based policy

Edit this section Report an issue

You can use this type of policy to define conditions for your permissions where a set of one or more clients is permitted to access an object.

To create a new client-based policy, select Client from the policy type list.

Add a Client Policy

Add a Client Policy

Configuration

  • Name

    A human-readable and unique string identifying the policy. A best practice is to use names that are closely related to your business and security requirements, so you can identify them more easily.

  • Description

    A string containing details about this policy.

  • Clients

    Specifies which clients have givenGroup-based policy access by this policy.

  • Logic

    The logic of this policy to apply after the other conditions have been evaluated.

Additional resources

Group-based policy

Edit this section Report an issue

You can use this type of policy to define conditions for your permissions where a set of one or more groups (and their hierarchies) is permitted to access an object.

To create a new group-based policy, select Group from the policy type list.

Group Policy

Add Group Policy

Configuration

  • Name

    A human-readable and unique string describing the policy. A best practice is to use names that are closely related to your business and security requirements, so you can identify them more easily.

  • Description

    A string containing details about this policy.

  • Groups Claim

    Specifies the name of the claim in the token holding the group names and/or paths. Usually, authorization requests are processed based on an ID Token or Access Token previously issued to a client acting on behalf of some user. If defined, the token must include a claim from where this policy is going to obtain the groups the user is a member of. If not defined, user’s groups are obtained from your realm configuration.

  • Groups

    Allows you to select the groups that should be enforced by this policy when evaluating permissions. After adding a group, you can extend access to children of the group by marking the checkbox Extend to Children. If left unmarked, access restrictions only applies to the selected group.

  • Logic

    The logic of this policy to apply after the other conditions have been evaluated.

Additional resources

Extending access to child groups

Edit this section Report an issue

By default, when you add a group to this policy, access restrictions will only apply to members of the selected group.

Under some circumstances, it might be necessary to allow access not only to the group itself but to any child group in the hierarchy. For any group added you can mark a checkbox Extend to Children in order to extend access to child groups.

Extending access to child groups

Extending access to child groups

In the example above, the policy is granting access for any user member of IT or any of its children.

Client scope-based policy

Edit this section Report an issue

You can use this type of policy to define conditions for your permissions where a set of one or more client scopes is permitted to access an object.

By default, client scopes added to this policy are not specified as required and the policy will grant access if the client requesting access has been granted any of these client scopes. However, you can specify a specific client scope as required if you want to enforce a specific client scope.

To create a new client scope-based policy, select Client Scope from the policy type list.

Add Client Scope Policy

Add Client Scope Policy

Configuration

  • Name

    A human-readable and unique string describing the policy. A best practice is to use names that are closely related to your business and security requirements, so you can identify them more easily.

  • Description

    A string containing details about this policy.

  • Client Scopes

    Specifies which client scopes are permitted by this policy.

  • Logic

    The logic of this policy to apply after the other conditions have been evaluated.

Additional resources

Defining a client scope as required

Edit this section Report an issue

When creating a client scope-based policy, you can specify a specific client scope as Required. When you do that, the policy will grant access only if the client requesting access has been granted all the required client scopes.

Example of required client scope

Example of required client scope

To specify a client scope as required, select the Required checkbox for the client scope you want to configure as required.

Required client scopes can be useful when your policy defines multiple client scopes but only a subset of them are mandatory.

Regex-Based Policy

Edit this section Report an issue

You can use this type of policy to define regex conditions for your permissions.

To create a new regex-based policy, select Regex from the policy type list.

This policy resolves attributes available from the current identity.

Add Regex Policy

Add Regex Policy

Configuration

  • Name

    A human-readable and unique string describing the policy. A best practice is to use names that are closely related to your business and security requirements, so you can identify them more easily.

  • Description

    A string containing details about this policy.

  • Target Claim

    Specifies the name of the target claim in the token. For JSON-based claims, you can use dot notation for nesting and square brackets to access array fields by index. For example, contact.address[0].country. If the target claim references a JSON object, the first path (for example, contact) should map to the attribute name holding the JSON object.

  • Regex Pattern

    Specifies the regex pattern.

  • Logic

    The Logic of this policy to apply after the other conditions have been evaluated.

Positive and negative logic

Edit this section Report an issue

Policies can be configured with positive or negative logic. Briefly, you can use this option to define whether the policy result should be kept as it is or be negated.

For example, suppose you want to create a policy where only users not granted with a specific role should be given access. In this case, you can create a role-based policy using that role and set its Logic field to Negative. If you keep Positive, which is the default behavior, the policy result will be kept as it is.

Policy evaluation API

Edit this section Report an issue

When writing rule-based policies using JavaScript, Keycloak provides an Evaluation API that provides useful information to help determine whether a permission should be granted.

This API consists of a few interfaces that provide you access to information, such as

  • The permission being evaluated, representing both the resource and scopes being requested.

  • The attributes associated with the resource being requested

  • Runtime environment and any other attribute associated with the execution context

  • Information about users such as group membership and roles

The main interface is org.keycloak.authorization.policy.evaluation.Evaluation, which defines the following contract:

public interface Evaluation {

    /**
     * Returns the {@link ResourcePermission} to be evaluated.
     *
     * @return the permission to be evaluated
     */
    ResourcePermission getPermission();

    /**
     * Returns the {@link EvaluationContext}. Which provides access to the whole evaluation runtime context.
     *
     * @return the evaluation context
     */
    EvaluationContext getContext();

    /**
     * Returns a {@link Realm} that can be used by policies to query information.
     *
     * @return a {@link Realm} instance
     */
    Realm getRealm();

    /**
     * Grants the requested permission to the caller.
     */
    void grant();

    /**
     * Denies the requested permission.
     */
    void deny();
}

When processing an authorization request, Keycloak creates an Evaluation instance before evaluating any policy. This instance is then passed to each policy to determine whether access is GRANT or DENY.

Policies determine this by invoking the grant() or deny() methods on an Evaluation instance. By default, the state of the Evaluation instance is denied, which means that your policies must explicitly invoke the grant() method to indicate to the policy evaluation engine that permission should be granted.

Additional resources

The evaluation context

The evaluation context provides useful information to policies during their evaluation.

public interface EvaluationContext {

    /**
     * Returns the {@link Identity} that represents an entity (person or non-person) to which the permissions must be granted, or not.
     *
     * @return the identity to which the permissions must be granted, or not
     */
    Identity getIdentity();

    /**
     * Returns all attributes within the current execution and runtime environment.
     *
     * @return the attributes within the current execution and runtime environment
     */
    Attributes getAttributes();
}

From this interface, policies can obtain:

  • The authenticated Identity

  • Information about the execution context and runtime environment

The Identity is built based on the OAuth2 Access Token that was sent along with the authorization request, and this construct has access to all claims extracted from the original token. For example, if you are using a Protocol Mapper to include a custom claim in an OAuth2 Access Token you can also access this claim from a policy and use it to build your conditions.

The EvaluationContext also gives you access to attributes related to both the execution and runtime environments. For now, there only a few built-in attributes.

Table 1. Execution and Runtime Attributes
Name Description Type

kc.time.date_time

Current date and time

String. Format MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss

kc.client.network.ip_address

IPv4 address of the client

String

kc.client.network.host

Client’s host name

String

kc.client.id

The client id

String

kc.client.user_agent

The value of the 'User-Agent' HTTP header

String[]

kc.realm.name

The name of the realm

String

Managing permissions

Edit this section Report an issue

A permission associates the object being protected and the policies that must be evaluated to decide whether access should be granted.

After creating the resources you want to protect and the policies you want to use to protect these resources, you can start managing permissions. To manage permissions, click the Permissions tab when editing a resource server.

Permissions

Permissions

Permissions can be created to protect two main types of objects:

  • Resources

  • Scopes

To create a permission, select the permission type you want to create from the item list in the upper right corner of the permission listing. The following sections describe these two types of objects in more detail.

Creating resource-based permission

Edit this section Report an issue

A resource-based permission defines a set of one or more resources to protect using a set of one or more authorization policies.

To create a new resource-based permission, select Create resource-based permission from the Create permission dropdown.

Add Resource Permission

Add Resource Permission

Configuration

  • Name

    A human-readable and unique string describing the permission. A best practice is to use names that are closely related to your business and security requirements, so you can identify them more easily.

  • Description

    A string containing details about this permission.

  • Apply To Resource Type

    Specifies if the permission is applied to all resources with a given type. When selecting this field, you are prompted to enter the resource type to protect.

    • Resource Type

      Defines the resource type to protect. When defined, this permission is evaluated for all resources matching that type.

  • Resources

    Defines a set of one or more resources to protect.

  • Policy

    Defines a set of one or more policies to associate with a permission. To associate a policy you can either select an existing policy or create a new one by selecting the type of the policy you want to create.

  • Decision Strategy

    The Decision Strategy for this permission.

Typed resource permission

Edit this section Report an issue

Resource permissions can also be used to define policies that are to be applied to all resources with a given type. This form of resource-based permission can be useful when you have resources sharing common access requirements and constraints.

Frequently, resources within an application can be categorized (or typed) based on the data they encapsulate or the functionality they provide. For example, a financial application can manage different banking accounts where each one belongs to a specific customer. Although they are different banking accounts, they share common security requirements and constraints that are globally defined by the banking organization. With typed resource permissions, you can define common policies to apply to all banking accounts, such as:

  • Only the owner can manage his account

  • Only allow access from the owner’s country and/or region

  • Enforce a specific authentication method

To create a typed resource permission, click Apply to Resource Type when creating a new resource-based permission. With Apply to Resource Type set to On, you can specify the type that you want to protect as well as the policies that are to be applied to govern access to all resources with type you have specified.

Example of a typed resource permission

Example of a typed resource permission

Creating scope-based permissions

Edit this section Report an issue

A scope-based permission defines a set of one or more scopes to protect using a set of one or more authorization policies. Unlike resource-based permissions, you can use this permission type to create permissions not only for a resource, but also for the scopes associated with it, providing more granularity when defining the permissions that govern your resources and the actions that can be performed on them.

To create a new scope-based permission, select Create scope-based permission from the Create permission dropdown.

Add Scope Permission

Add Scope Permission

Configuration

  • Name

    A human-readable and unique string describing the permission. A best practice is to use names that are closely related to your business and security requirements, so you can identify them more easily.

  • Description

    A string containing details about this permission.

  • Resource

    Restricts the scopes to those associated with the selected resource. If none is selected, all scopes are available.

  • Scopes

    Defines a set of one or more scopes to protect.

  • Policy

    Defines a set of one or more policies to associate with a permission. To associate a policy you can either select an existing policy or create a new one by selecting the type of the policy you want to create.

  • Decision Strategy

    The Decision Strategy for this permission.

Policy decision strategies

Edit this section Report an issue

When associating policies with a permission, you can also define a decision strategy to specify how to evaluate the outcome of the associated policies to determine access.

  • Unanimous

    The default strategy if none is provided. In this case, all policies must evaluate to a positive decision for the final decision to be also positive.

  • Affirmative

    In this case, at least one policy must evaluate to a positive decision for the final decision to be also positive.

  • Consensus

    In this case, the number of positive decisions must be greater than the number of negative decisions. If the number of positive and negative decisions is equal, the final decision will be negative.

Evaluating and testing policies

Edit this section Report an issue

When designing your policies, you can simulate authorization requests to test how your policies are being evaluated.

You can access the Policy Evaluation Tool by clicking the Evaluate tab when editing a resource server. There you can specify different inputs to simulate real authorization requests and test the effect of your policies.

Policy evaluation tool

Policy evaluation tool

Providing identity information

The Identity Information filters can be used to specify the user requesting permissions.

Providing contextual information

The Contextual Information filters can be used to define additional attributes to the evaluation context, so that policies can obtain these same attributes.

Providing the permissions

The Permissions filters can be used to build an authorization request. You can request permissions for a set of one or more resources and scopes. If you want to simulate authorization requests based on all protected resources and scopes, click Add without specifying any Resources or Scopes.

When you’ve specified your desired values, click Evaluate.

Authorization services

Edit this section Report an issue

Keycloak Authorization Services are built on top of well-known standards such as the OAuth2 and User-Managed Access specifications.

OAuth2 clients (such as front end applications) can obtain access tokens from the server using the token endpoint and use these same tokens to access resources protected by a resource server (such as back end services). In the same way, Keycloak Authorization Services provide extensions to OAuth2 to allow access tokens to be issued based on the processing of all policies associated with the resource(s) or scope(s) being requested. This means that resource servers can enforce access to their protected resources based on the permissions granted by the server and held by an access token. In Keycloak Authorization Services the access token with permissions is called a Requesting Party Token or RPT for short.

In addition to the issuance of RPTs, Keycloak Authorization Services also provides a set of RESTful endpoints that allow resources servers to manage their protected resources, scopes, permissions and policies, helping developers to extend or integrate these capabilities into their applications in order to support fine-grained authorization.

Discovering authorization services endpoints and metadata

Edit this section Report an issue

Keycloak provides a discovery document from which clients can obtain all necessary information to interact with Keycloak Authorization Services, including endpoint locations and capabilities.

The discovery document can be obtained from:

curl -X GET \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/.well-known/uma2-configuration

Where ${host}:${port} is the hostname (or IP address) and port where Keycloak is running and ${realm} is the name of a realm in Keycloak.

As a result, you should get a response as follows:

{

    // some claims are expected here

    // these are the main claims in the discovery document about Authorization Services endpoints location
    "token_endpoint": "http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/protocol/openid-connect/token",
    "token_introspection_endpoint": "http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/protocol/openid-connect/token/introspect",
    "resource_registration_endpoint": "http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/authz/protection/resource_set",
    "permission_endpoint": "http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/authz/protection/permission",
    "policy_endpoint": "http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/authz/protection/uma-policy"
}

Each of these endpoints expose a specific set of capabilities:

  • token_endpoint

    A OAuth2-compliant Token Endpoint that supports the urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:uma-ticket grant type. Through this endpoint clients can send authorization requests and obtain an RPT with all permissions granted by Keycloak.

  • token_introspection_endpoint

    A OAuth2-compliant Token Introspection Endpoint which clients can use to query the server to determine the active state of an RPT and to determine any other information associated with the token, such as the permissions granted by Keycloak.

  • resource_registration_endpoint

    A UMA-compliant Resource Registration Endpoint which resource servers can use to manage their protected resources and scopes. This endpoint provides operations create, read, update and delete resources and scopes in Keycloak.

  • permission_endpoint

    A UMA-compliant Permission Endpoint which resource servers can use to manage permission tickets. This endpoint provides operations create, read, update, and delete permission tickets in Keycloak.

Obtaining permissions

Edit this section Report an issue

To obtain permissions from Keycloak you send an authorization request to the token endpoint. As a result, Keycloak will evaluate all policies associated with the resource(s) and scope(s) being requested and issue an RPT with all permissions granted by the server.

Clients are allowed to send authorization requests to the token endpoint using the following parameters:

  • grant_type

    This parameter is required. Must be urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:uma-ticket.

  • ticket

    This parameter is optional. The most recent permission ticket received by the client as part of the UMA authorization process.

  • claim_token

    This parameter is optional. A string representing additional claims that should be considered by the server when evaluating permissions for the resource(s) and scope(s) being requested. This parameter allows clients to push claims to Keycloak. For more details about all supported token formats see claim_token_format parameter.

  • claim_token_format

    This parameter is optional. A string indicating the format of the token specified in the claim_token parameter. Keycloak supports two token formats: urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:jwt and https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#IDToken. The urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:jwt format indicates that the claim_token parameter references an access token. The https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#IDToken indicates that the claim_token parameter references an OpenID Connect ID Token.

  • rpt

    This parameter is optional. A previously issued RPT which permissions should also be evaluated and added in a new one. This parameter allows clients in possession of an RPT to perform incremental authorization where permissions are added on demand.

  • permission

    This parameter is optional. A string representing a set of one or more resources and scopes the client is seeking access. This parameter can be defined multiple times in order to request permission for multiple resource and scopes. This parameter is an extension to urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:uma-ticket grant type in order to allow clients to send authorization requests without a permission ticket. The format of the string must be: RESOURCE_ID#SCOPE_ID. For instance: Resource A#Scope A, Resource A#Scope A, Scope B, Scope C, Resource A, #Scope A.

  • permission_resource_format

    This parameter is optional. A string representing a format indicating the resource in the permission parameter. Possible values are id and uri. id indicates the format is RESOURCE_ID. uri indicates the format is URI. If not specified, the default is id.

  • permission_resource_matching_uri

    This parameter is optional. A boolean value that indicates whether to use path matching when representing resources in URI format in the permission parameter. If not specified, the default is false.

  • audience

    This parameter is optional. The client identifier of the resource server to which the client is seeking access. This parameter is mandatory in case the permission parameter is defined. It serves as a hint to Keycloak to indicate the context in which permissions should be evaluated.

  • response_include_resource_name

    This parameter is optional. A boolean value indicating to the server whether resource names should be included in the RPT’s permissions. If false, only the resource identifier is included.

  • response_permissions_limit

    This parameter is optional. An integer N that defines a limit for the amount of permissions an RPT can have. When used together with rpt parameter, only the last N requested permissions will be kept in the RPT.

  • submit_request

    This parameter is optional. A boolean value indicating whether the server should create permission requests to the resources and scopes referenced by a permission ticket. This parameter only has effect if used together with the ticket parameter as part of a UMA authorization process.

  • response_mode

    This parameter is optional. A string value indicating how the server should respond to authorization requests. This parameter is specially useful when you are mainly interested in either the overall decision or the permissions granted by the server, instead of a standard OAuth2 response. Possible values are:

    • decision

      Indicates that responses from the server should only represent the overall decision by returning a JSON with the following format:

      {
    'result': true
}

      If the authorization request does not map to any permission, a 403 HTTP status code is returned instead.

    • permissions

      Indicates that responses from the server should contain any permission granted by the server by returning a JSON with the following format:

      [
    {
        'rsid': 'My Resource'
        'scopes': ['view', 'update']
    },

    ...
]

      If the authorization request does not map to any permission, a 403 HTTP status code is returned instead.

Example of an authorization request when a client is seeking access to two resources protected by a resource server.

curl -X POST \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/protocol/openid-connect/token \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer ${access_token}" \
  --data "grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:uma-ticket" \
  --data "audience={resource_server_client_id}" \
  --data "permission=Resource A#Scope A" \
  --data "permission=Resource B#Scope B"

Example of an authorization request when a client is seeking access to any resource and scope protected by a resource server. NOTE: This will not evaluate the permissions for all resources. Instead, the permissions for resources owned by the resource server, owned by the requesting user, and explicitly granted to the requesting user by other owners are evaluated.

curl -X POST \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/protocol/openid-connect/token \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer ${access_token}" \
  --data "grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:uma-ticket" \
  --data "audience={resource_server_client_id}"

Example of an authorization request when a client is seeking access to a UMA protected resource after receiving a permission ticket from the resource server as part of the authorization process:

curl -X POST \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/protocol/openid-connect/token \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer ${access_token}" \
  --data "grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:uma-ticket" \
  --data "ticket=${permission_ticket}

If Keycloak assessment process results in issuance of permissions, it issues the RPT with which it has associated the permissions:

Keycloak responds to the client with the RPT
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/json
...
{
    "access_token": "${rpt}",
}

The response from the server is just like any other response from the token endpoint when using some other grant type. The RPT can be obtained from the access_token response parameter. If the client is not authorized, Keycloak responds with a 403 HTTP status code:

Keycloak denies the authorization request
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Content-Type: application/json
...
{
    "error": "access_denied",
    "error_description": "request_denied"
}

Client authentication methods

Edit this section Report an issue

Clients need to authenticate to the token endpoint in order to obtain an RPT. When using the urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:uma-ticket grant type, clients can use any of these authentication methods:

  • Bearer Token

    Clients should send an access token as a Bearer credential in an HTTP Authorization header to the token endpoint.

    Example: an authorization request using an access token to authenticate to the token endpoint
    curl -X POST \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/protocol/openid-connect/token \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer ${access_token}" \
  --data "grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:uma-ticket"

    This method is especially useful when the client is acting on behalf of a user. In this case, the bearer token is an access token previously issued by Keycloak to some client acting on behalf of a user (or on behalf of itself). Permissions will be evaluated considering the access context represented by the access token. For instance, if the access token was issued to Client A acting on behalf of User A, permissions will be granted depending on the resources and scopes to which User A has access.

  • Client Credentials

    Clients can use any of the client authentication methods supported by Keycloak. For instance, client_id/client_secret or JWT.

    Example: an authorization request using client id and client secret to authenticate to the token endpoint
    curl -X POST \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/protocol/openid-connect/token \
  -H "Authorization: Basic cGhvdGg6L7Jl13RmfWgtkk==pOnNlY3JldA==" \
  --data "grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:uma-ticket"

Pushing claims

Edit this section Report an issue

When obtaining permissions from the server you can push arbitrary claims in order to have these claims available to your policies when evaluating permissions.

If you are obtaining permissions from the server without using a permission ticket (UMA flow), you can send an authorization request to the token endpoint as follows:

curl -X POST \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/protocol/openid-connect/token \
  --data "grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:uma-ticket" \
  --data "claim_token=ewogICAib3JnYW5pemF0aW9uIjogWyJhY21lIl0KfQ==" \
  --data "claim_token_format=urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:jwt" \
  --data "client_id={resource_server_client_id}" \
  --data "client_secret={resource_server_client_secret}" \
  --data "audience={resource_server_client_id}"

The claim_token parameter expects a BASE64 encoded JSON with a format similar to the example below:

{
    "organization" : ["acme"]
}

The format expects one or more claims where the value for each claim must be an array of strings.

Pushing claims Using UMA

For more details about how to push claims when using UMA and permission tickets, please take a look at Permission API

User-managed access

Edit this section Report an issue

Keycloak Authorization Services is based on User-Managed Access or UMA for short. UMA is a specification that enhances OAuth2 capabilities in the following ways:

  • Privacy

    Nowadays, user privacy is becoming a huge concern, as more and more data and devices are available and connected to the cloud. With UMA and Keycloak, resource servers can enhance their capabilities in order to improve how their resources are protected in respect to user privacy where permissions are granted based on policies defined by the user.

  • Party-to-Party Authorization

    Resource owners (e.g.: regular end-users) can manage access to their resources and authorize other parties (e.g: regular end-users) to access these resources. This is different than OAuth2 where consent is given to a client application acting on behalf of a user, with UMA resource owners are allowed to consent access to other users, in a completely asynchronous manner.

  • Resource Sharing

    Resource owners are allowed to manage permissions to their resources and decide who can access a particular resource and how. Keycloak can then act as a sharing management service from which resource owners can manage their resources.

Keycloak is a UMA 2.0 compliant authorization server that provides most UMA capabilities.

As an example, consider a user Alice (resource owner) using an Internet Banking Service (resource server) to manage her Bank Account (resource). One day, Alice decides to open her bank account to Bob (requesting party), an accounting professional. However, Bob should only have access to view (scope) Alice’s account.

As a resource server, the Internet Banking Service must be able to protect Alice’s Bank Account. For that, it relies on Keycloak Resource Registration Endpoint to create a resource in the server representing Alice’s Bank Account.

At this moment, if Bob tries to access Alice’s Bank Account, access will be denied. The Internet Banking Service defines a few default policies for banking accounts. One of them is that only the owner, in this case Alice, is allowed to access her bank account.

However, Internet Banking Service in respect to Alice’s privacy also allows her to change specific policies for the banking account. One of these policies that she can change is to define which people are allowed to view her bank account. For that, Internet Banking Service relies on Keycloak to provide to Alice a space where she can select individuals and the operations (or data) they are allowed to access. At any time, Alice can revoke access or grant additional permissions to Bob.

Authorization process

Edit this section Report an issue

In UMA, the authorization process starts when a client tries to access a UMA protected resource server.

A UMA protected resource server expects a bearer token in the request where the token is an RPT. When a client requests a resource at the resource server without an RPT:

Client requests a protected resource without sending an RPT
curl -X GET \
  http://${host}:${port}/my-resource-server/resource/1bfdfe78-a4e1-4c2d-b142-fc92b75b986f

The resource server sends a response back to the client with a permission ticket and a as_uri parameter with the location of a Keycloak server to where the ticket should be sent in order to obtain an RPT.

Resource server responds with a permission ticket
HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
WWW-Authenticate: UMA realm="${realm}",
    as_uri="https://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}",
    ticket="016f84e8-f9b9-11e0-bd6f-0021cc6004de"

The permission ticket is a special type of token issued by Keycloak Permission API. They represent the permissions being requested (e.g.: resources and scopes) as well any other information associated with the request. Only resource servers are allowed to create those tokens.

Now that the client has a permission ticket and also the location of a Keycloak server, the client can use the discovery document to obtain the location of the token endpoint and send an authorization request.

Client sends an authorization request to the token endpoint to obtain an RPT
curl -X POST \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/protocol/openid-connect/token \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer ${access_token}" \
  --data "grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:uma-ticket" \
  --data "ticket=${permission_ticket}

If Keycloak assessment process results in issuance of permissions, it issues the RPT with which it has associated the permissions:

Keycloak responds to the client with the RPT
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/json
...
{
    "access_token": "${rpt}",
}

The response from the server is just like any other response from the token endpoint when using some other grant type. The RPT can be obtained from the access_token response parameter. In case the client is not authorized to have permissions Keycloak responds with a 403 HTTP status code:

Keycloak denies the authorization request
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Content-Type: application/json
...
{
    "error": "access_denied",
    "error_description": "request_denied"
}

Submitting permission requests

Edit this section Report an issue

As part of the authorization process, clients need first to obtain a permission ticket from a UMA protected resource server in order to exchange it with an RPT at the Keycloak Token Endpoint.

By default, Keycloak responds with a 403 HTTP status code and a request_denied error in case the client can not be issued with an RPT.

Keycloak denies the authorization request
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Content-Type: application/json
...
{
    "error": "access_denied",
    "error_description": "request_denied"
}

Such response implies that Keycloak could not issue an RPT with the permissions represented by a permission ticket.

In some situations, client applications may want to start an asynchronous authorization flow and let the owner of the resources being requested decide whether or not access should be granted. For that, clients can use the submit_request request parameter along with an authorization request to the token endpoint:

curl -X POST \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/protocol/openid-connect/token \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer ${access_token}" \
  --data "grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:uma-ticket" \
  --data "ticket=${permission_ticket} \
  --data "submit_request=true"

When using the submit_request parameter, Keycloak will persist a permission request for each resource to which access was denied. Once created, resource owners can check their account and manage their permissions requests.

You can think about this functionality as a Request Access button in your application, where users can ask other users for access to their resources.

Managing access to users resources

Edit this section Report an issue

Users can manage access to their resources using the Keycloak Account Console. To enable this functionality, you must first enable User-Managed Access for your realm.

Procedure

  1. Log into the Admin Console.

  2. Click Realm Settings in the menu.

  3. Toggle User-Managed Access to ON.

  4. Click the user name at the top right of the Admin Console and select Manage Account.

    My Resources

  5. Click My Resources in the menu option. A page displays with the following options.

    • Manage My resources

      This section contains a list of all resources owned by the user. Users can click on a resource for more details and share the resource with others. When there is a permission requests awaiting approval an icon is put next to the name of the resource. These requests are connected to the parties (users) requesting access to a particular resource. Users are allowed to approve or deny these requests. You can do so by clicking the icon

      Resource Detail

    • Manage Resources shared with me

      This section contains a list of all resources shared with the user.

    • Manage People with access to this resource

      This section contains a list of people with access to this resource. Users are allowed to revoke access by clicking on the Revoke button or by removing a specific Permission.

    • Share the resource with others

      By typing the username or e-mail of another user, the user is able to share the resource and select the permissions he wants to grant access.

Protection API

Edit this section Report an issue

The Protection API provides a UMA-compliant set of endpoints providing:

  • Resource Management

    With this endpoint, resource servers can manage their resources remotely and enable policy enforcers to query the server for the resources that need protection.

  • Permission Management

    In the UMA protocol, resource servers access this endpoint to create permission tickets. Keycloak also provides endpoints to manage the state of permissions and query permissions.

  • Policy API

    Keycloak leverages the UMA Protection API to allow resource servers to manage permissions for their users. In addition to the Resource and Permission APIs, Keycloak provides a Policy API from where permissions can be set to resources by resource servers on behalf of their users.

An important requirement for this API is that only resource servers are allowed to access its endpoints using a special OAuth2 access token called a protection API token (PAT). In UMA, a PAT is a token with the scope uma_protection.

What is a PAT and how to obtain it

Edit this section Report an issue

A protection API token (PAT) is a special OAuth2 access token with a scope defined as uma_protection. When you create a resource server, Keycloak automatically creates a role, uma_protection, for the corresponding client application and associates it with the client’s service account.

Service Account granted with uma_protection role

Service Account granted with uma_protection role

Resource servers can obtain a PAT from Keycloak like any other OAuth2 access token. For example, using curl:

curl -X POST \
    -H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
    -d 'grant_type=client_credentials&client_id=${client_id}&client_secret=${client_secret}' \
    "http://localhost:8080/realms/${realm_name}/protocol/openid-connect/token"

The example above is using the client_credentials grant type to obtain a PAT from the server. As a result, the server returns a response similar to the following:

{
  "access_token": ${PAT},
  "expires_in": 300,
  "refresh_expires_in": 1800,
  "refresh_token": ${refresh_token},
  "token_type": "bearer",
  "id_token": ${id_token},
  "not-before-policy": 0,
  "session_state": "ccea4a55-9aec-4024-b11c-44f6f168439e"
}
Keycloak can authenticate your client application in different ways. For simplicity, the client_credentials grant type is used here, which requires a client_id and a client_secret. You can choose to use any supported authentication method.

Managing resources

Edit this section Report an issue

Resource servers can manage their resources remotely using a UMA-compliant endpoint.

http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/resource_set

This endpoint provides operations outlined as follows (entire path omitted for clarity):

  • Create resource set description: POST /resource_set

  • Read resource set description: GET /resource_set/{_id}

  • Update resource set description: PUT /resource_set/{_id}

  • Delete resource set description: DELETE /resource_set/{_id}

  • List resource set descriptions: GET /resource_set

For more information about the contract for each of these operations, see UMA Resource Registration API.

Creating a resource

To create a resource you must send an HTTP POST request as follows:

curl -v -X POST \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/resource_set \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$pat \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
     "name":"Tweedl Social Service",
     "type":"http://www.example.com/rsrcs/socialstream/140-compatible",
     "icon_uri":"http://www.example.com/icons/sharesocial.png",
     "resource_scopes":[
         "read-public",
         "post-updates",
         "read-private",
         "http://www.example.com/scopes/all"
      ]
  }'

By default, the owner of a resource is the resource server. If you want to define a different owner, such as a specific user, you can send a request as follows:

curl -v -X POST \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/resource_set \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$pat \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
     "name":"Alice Resource",
     "owner": "alice"
  }'

Where the property owner can be set with the username or the identifier of the user.

Creating user-managed resources

By default, resources created via Protection API can not be managed by resource owners through the Account Console.

To create resources and allow resource owners to manage these resources, you must set ownerManagedAccess property as follows:

curl -v -X POST \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/resource_set \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$pat \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
     "name":"Alice Resource",
     "owner": "alice",
     "ownerManagedAccess": true
  }'
Updating resources

To update an existing resource, send an HTTP PUT request as follows:

curl -v -X PUT \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/resource_set/{resource_id} \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$pat \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
     "_id": "Alice Resource",
     "name":"Alice Resource",
     "resource_scopes": [
        "read"
     ]
  }'
Deleting resources

To delete an existing resource, send an HTTP DELETE request as follows:

curl -v -X DELETE \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/resource_set/{resource_id} \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$pat
Querying resources

To query the resources by id, send an HTTP GET request as follows:

http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/resource_set/{resource_id}

To query resources given a name, send an HTTP GET request as follows:

http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/resource_set?name=Alice Resource

By default, the name filter will match any resource with the given pattern. To restrict the query to only return resources with an exact match, use:

http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/resource_set?name=Alice Resource&exactName=true

To query resources given an uri, send an HTTP GET request as follows:

http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/resource_set?uri=/api/alice

To query resources given an owner, send an HTTP GET request as follows:

http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/resource_set?owner=alice

To query resources given an type, send an HTTP GET request as follows:

http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/resource_set?type=albums

To query resources given an scope, send an HTTP GET request as follows:

http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/resource_set?scope=read

When querying the server for permissions use parameters first and max results to limit the result.

Managing permission requests

Edit this section Report an issue

Resource servers using the UMA protocol can use a specific endpoint to manage permission requests. This endpoint provides a UMA-compliant flow for registering permission requests and obtaining a permission ticket.

http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/permission

A permission ticket is a special security token type representing a permission request. Per the UMA specification, a permission ticket is:

A correlation handle that is conveyed from an authorization server to a resource server, from a resource server to a client, and ultimately from a client back to an authorization server, to enable the authorization server to assess the correct policies to apply to a request for authorization data.

In most cases, you won’t need to deal with this endpoint directly. Keycloak provides a policy enforcer that enables UMA for your resource server so it can obtain a permission ticket from the authorization server, return this ticket to client application, and enforce authorization decisions based on a final requesting party token (RPT).

The process of obtaining permission tickets from Keycloak is performed by resource servers and not regular client applications, where permission tickets are obtained when a client tries to access a protected resource without the necessary grants to access the resource. The issuance of permission tickets is an important aspects when using UMA as it allows resource servers to:

  • Abstract from clients the data associated with the resources protected by the resource server

  • Register in the Keycloak authorization requests which in turn can be used later in workflows to grant access based on the resource’s owner consent

  • Decouple resource servers from authorization servers and allow them to protect and manage their resources using different authorization servers

Client wise, a permission ticket has also important aspects that its worthy to highlight:

  • Clients don’t need to know about how authorization data is associated with protected resources. A permission ticket is completely opaque to clients.

  • Clients can have access to resources on different resource servers and protected by different authorization servers

These are just some of the benefits brought by UMA where other aspects of UMA are strongly based on permission tickets, specially regarding privacy and user controlled access to their resources.

Creating permission ticket

To create a permission ticket, send an HTTP POST request as follows:

curl -X POST \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/permission \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$pat \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '[
  {
    "resource_id": "{resource_id}",
    "resource_scopes": [
      "view"
    ]
  }
]'

When creating tickets you can also push arbitrary claims and associate these claims with the ticket:

curl -X POST \
  http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/permission \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$pat \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '[
  {
    "resource_id": "{resource_id}",
    "resource_scopes": [
      "view"
    ],
    "claims": {
        "organization": ["acme"]
    }
  }
]'

Where these claims will be available to your policies when evaluating permissions for the resource and scope(s) associated with the permission ticket.

Other non UMA-compliant endpoints
Creating permission ticket

To grant permissions for a specific resource with id {resource_id} to a user with id {user_id}, as an owner of the resource send an HTTP POST request as follows:

curl -X POST \
     http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/permission/ticket \
     -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$access_token \
     -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
     -d '{
       "resource": "{resource_id}",
       "requester": "{user_id}",
       "granted": true,
       "scopeName": "view"
     }'
Getting permission tickets
curl http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/permission/ticket \
     -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$access_token

You can use any of these query parameters:

  • scopeId

  • resourceId

  • owner

  • requester

  • granted

  • returnNames

  • first

  • max

Updating permission ticket
curl -X PUT \
     http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/permission/ticket \
     -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$access_token \
     -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
     -d '{
       "id": "{ticket_id}"
       "resource": "{resource_id}",
       "requester": "{user_id}",
       "granted": false,
       "scopeName": "view"
     }'
Deleting permission ticket
curl -X DELETE http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/permission/ticket/{ticket_id} \
     -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$access_token

Managing resource permissions using the Policy API

Edit this section Report an issue

Keycloak leverages the UMA Protection API to allow resource servers to manage permissions for their users. In addition to the Resource and Permission APIs, Keycloak provides a Policy API from where permissions can be set to resources by resource servers on behalf of their users.

The Policy API is available at:

http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/uma-policy/{resource_id}

This API is protected by a bearer token that must represent a consent granted by the user to the resource server to manage permissions on his behalf. The bearer token can be a regular access token obtained from the token endpoint using:

  • Resource Owner Password Credentials Grant Type

  • Token Exchange, in order to exchange an access token granted to some client (public client) for a token where audience is the resource server

Associating a permission with a resource

To associate a permission with a specific resource you must send a HTTP POST request as follows:

curl -X POST \
  http://localhost:8180/realms/photoz/authz/protection/uma-policy/{resource_id} \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$access_token \
  -H 'Cache-Control: no-cache' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
        "name": "Any people manager",
        "description": "Allow access to any people manager",
        "scopes": ["read"],
        "roles": ["people-manager"]
}'

In the example above we are creating and associating a new permission to a resource represented by resource_id where any user with a role people-manager should be granted with the read scope.

You can also create policies using other access control mechanisms, such as using groups:

curl -X POST \
  http://localhost:8180/realms/photoz/authz/protection/uma-policy/{resource_id} \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$access_token \
  -H 'Cache-Control: no-cache' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
        "name": "Any people manager",
        "description": "Allow access to any people manager",
        "scopes": ["read"],
        "groups": ["/Managers/People Managers"]
}'

Or a specific client:

curl -X POST \
  http://localhost:8180/realms/photoz/authz/protection/uma-policy/{resource_id} \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$access_token \
  -H 'Cache-Control: no-cache' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
        "name": "Any people manager",
        "description": "Allow access to any people manager",
        "scopes": ["read"],
        "clients": ["my-client"]
}'

Or even using a custom policy using JavaScript:

Upload Scripts is Deprecated and will be removed in future releases. This feature is disabled by default.

To enable start the server with -Dkeycloak.profile.feature.upload_scripts=enabled . For more details see the Enabling and disabling features guide.

 
curl -X POST \
  http://localhost:8180/realms/photoz/authz/protection/uma-policy/{resource_id} \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$access_token \
  -H 'Cache-Control: no-cache' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
        "name": "Any people manager",
        "description": "Allow access to any people manager",
        "scopes": ["read"],
        "condition": "my-deployed-script.js"
}'

It is also possible to set any combination of these access control mechanisms.

To update an existing permission, send an HTTP PUT request as follows:

curl -X PUT \
  http://localhost:8180/realms/photoz/authz/protection/uma-policy/{permission_id} \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$access_token \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
    "id": "21eb3fed-02d7-4b5a-9102-29f3f09b6de2",
    "name": "Any people manager",
    "description": "Allow access to any people manager",
    "type": "uma",
    "scopes": [
        "album:view"
    ],
    "logic": "POSITIVE",
    "decisionStrategy": "UNANIMOUS",
    "owner": "7e22131a-aa57-4f5f-b1db-6e82babcd322",
    "roles": [
        "user"
    ]
}'
Removing a permission

To remove a permission associated with a resource, send an HTTP DELETE request as follows:

curl -X DELETE \
  http://localhost:8180/realms/photoz/authz/protection/uma-policy/{permission_id} \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer '$access_token
Querying permission

To query the permissions associated with a resource, send an HTTP GET request as follows:

http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/authz/protection/uma-policy?resource={resource_id}

To query the permissions given its name, send an HTTP GET request as follows:

http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/authz/protection/uma-policy?name=Any people manager

To query the permissions associated with a specific scope, send an HTTP GET request as follows:

http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/authz/protection/uma-policy?scope=read

To query all permissions, send an HTTP GET request as follows:

http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}/authz/protection/uma-policy

When querying the server for permissions use parameters first and max results to limit the result.

Requesting party token

Edit this section Report an issue

A requesting party token (RPT) is a JSON web token (JWT) digitally signed using JSON web signature (JWS). The token is built based on the OAuth2 access token previously issued by Keycloak to a specific client acting on behalf of a user or on its own behalf.

When you decode an RPT, you see a payload similar to the following:

{
  "authorization": {
      "permissions": [
        {
          "resource_set_id": "d2fe9843-6462-4bfc-baba-b5787bb6e0e7",
          "resource_set_name": "Hello World Resource"
        }
      ]
  },
  "jti": "d6109a09-78fd-4998-bf89-95730dfd0892-1464906679405",
  "exp": 1464906971,
  "nbf": 0,
  "iat": 1464906671,
  "sub": "f1888f4d-5172-4359-be0c-af338505d86c",
  "typ": "kc_ett",
  "azp": "hello-world-authz-service"
}

From this token you can obtain all permissions granted by the server from the permissions claim.

Also note that permissions are directly related with the resources/scopes you are protecting and completely decoupled from the access control methods that were used to actually grant and issue these same permissions.

Introspecting a requesting party token

Edit this section Report an issue

Sometimes you might want to introspect a requesting party token (RPT) to check its validity or obtain the permissions within the token to enforce authorization decisions on the resource server side.

There are two main use cases where token introspection can help you:

  • When client applications need to query the token validity to obtain a new one with the same or additional permissions

  • When enforcing authorization decisions at the resource server side, especially when none of the built-in policy enforcers fits your application

Obtaining Information about an RPT

The token introspection is essentially a OAuth2 token introspection-compliant endpoint from which you can obtain information about an RPT.

http://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm_name}/protocol/openid-connect/token/introspect

To introspect an RPT using this endpoint, you can send a request to the server as follows:

curl -X POST \
    -H "Authorization: Basic aGVsbG8td29ybGQtYXV0aHotc2VydmljZTpzZWNyZXQ=" \
    -H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
    -d 'token_type_hint=requesting_party_token&token=${RPT}' \
    "http://localhost:8080/realms/hello-world-authz/protocol/openid-connect/token/introspect"
The request above is using HTTP BASIC and passing the client’s credentials (client ID and secret) to authenticate the client attempting to introspect the token, but you can use any other client authentication method supported by Keycloak.

The introspection endpoint expects two parameters:

  • token_type_hint

    Use requesting_party_token as the value for this parameter, which indicates that you want to introspect an RPT.

  • token

    Use the token string as it was returned by the server during the authorization process as the value for this parameter.

As a result, the server response is:

{
  "permissions": [
    {
      "resource_id": "90ccc6fc-b296-4cd1-881e-089e1ee15957",
      "resource_name": "Hello World Resource"
    }
  ],
  "exp": 1465314139,
  "nbf": 0,
  "iat": 1465313839,
  "aud": "hello-world-authz-service",
  "active": true
}

If the RPT is not active, this response is returned instead:

{
  "active": false
}

Do I need to invoke the server every time I want to introspect an RPT?

No. Just like a regular access token issued by a Keycloak server, RPTs also use the JSON web token (JWT) specification as the default format.

If you want to validate these tokens without a call to the remote introspection endpoint, you can decode the RPT and query for its validity locally. Once you decode the token, you can also use the permissions within the token to enforce authorization decisions.

This is essentially what the policy enforcers do. Be sure to:

  • Validate the signature of the RPT (based on the realm’s public key)

  • Query for token validity based on its exp, iat, and aud claims

Additional resources

Authorization client java API

Edit this section Report an issue

Depending on your requirements, a resource server should be able to manage resources remotely or even check for permissions programmatically. If you are using Java, you can access the Keycloak Authorization Services using the Authorization Client API.

It is targeted for resource servers that want to access the different endpoints provided by the server such as the Token Endpoint, Resource, and Permission management endpoints.

Maven dependency

<dependencies>
    <dependency>
        <groupId>org.keycloak</groupId>
        <artifactId>keycloak-authz-client</artifactId>
        <version>${KEYCLOAK_VERSION}</version>
    </dependency>
</dependencies>

Configuration

The client configuration is defined in a keycloak.json file as follows:

{
  "realm": "hello-world-authz",
  "auth-server-url" : "http://localhost:8080",
  "resource" : "hello-world-authz-service",
  "credentials": {
    "secret": "secret"
  }
}

  • realm (required)

    The name of the realm.

  • auth-server-url (required)

    The base URL of the Keycloak server. All other Keycloak pages and REST service endpoints are derived from this. It is usually in the form https://host:port.

  • resource (required)

    The client-id of the application. Each application has a client-id that is used to identify the application.

  • credentials (required)

    Specifies the credentials of the application. This is an object notation where the key is the credential type and the value is the value of the credential type.

The configuration file is usually located in your application’s classpath, the default location from where the client is going to try to find a keycloak.json file.

Creating the authorization client

Considering you have a keycloak.json file in your classpath, you can create a new AuthzClient instance as follows:

    // create a new instance based on the configuration defined in a keycloak.json located in your classpath
    AuthzClient authzClient = AuthzClient.create();

Obtaining user entitlements

Here is an example illustrating how to obtain user entitlements:

// create a new instance based on the configuration defined in keycloak.json
AuthzClient authzClient = AuthzClient.create();

// create an authorization request
AuthorizationRequest request = new AuthorizationRequest();

// send the entitlement request to the server in order to
// obtain an RPT with all permissions granted to the user
AuthorizationResponse response = authzClient.authorization("alice", "alice").authorize(request);
String rpt = response.getToken();

System.out.println("You got an RPT: " + rpt);

// now you can use the RPT to access protected resources on the resource server

Here is an example illustrating how to obtain user entitlements for a set of one or more resources:

// create a new instance based on the configuration defined in keycloak.json
AuthzClient authzClient = AuthzClient.create();

// create an authorization request
AuthorizationRequest request = new AuthorizationRequest();

// add permissions to the request based on the resources and scopes you want to check access
request.addPermission("Default Resource");

// send the entitlement request to the server in order to
// obtain an RPT with permissions for a single resource
AuthorizationResponse response = authzClient.authorization("alice", "alice").authorize(request);
String rpt = response.getToken();

System.out.println("You got an RPT: " + rpt);

// now you can use the RPT to access protected resources on the resource server

Creating a resource using the protection API

// create a new instance based on the configuration defined in keycloak.json
AuthzClient authzClient = AuthzClient.create();

// create a new resource representation with the information we want
ResourceRepresentation newResource = new ResourceRepresentation();

newResource.setName("New Resource");
newResource.setType("urn:hello-world-authz:resources:example");

newResource.addScope(new ScopeRepresentation("urn:hello-world-authz:scopes:view"));

ProtectedResource resourceClient = authzClient.protection().resource();
ResourceRepresentation existingResource = resourceClient.findByName(newResource.getName());

if (existingResource != null) {
    resourceClient.delete(existingResource.getId());
}

// create the resource on the server
ResourceRepresentation response = resourceClient.create(newResource);
String resourceId = response.getId();

// query the resource using its newly generated id
ResourceRepresentation resource = resourceClient.findById(resourceId);

System.out.println(resource);

Introspecting an RPT

// create a new instance based on the configuration defined in keycloak.json
AuthzClient authzClient = AuthzClient.create();

// send the authorization request to the server in order to
// obtain an RPT with all permissions granted to the user
AuthorizationResponse response = authzClient.authorization("alice", "alice").authorize();
String rpt = response.getToken();

// introspect the token
TokenIntrospectionResponse requestingPartyToken = authzClient.protection().introspectRequestingPartyToken(rpt);

System.out.println("Token status is: " + requestingPartyToken.getActive());
System.out.println("Permissions granted by the server: ");

for (Permission granted : requestingPartyToken.getPermissions()) {
    System.out.println(granted);
}

Policy enforcers

Edit this section Report an issue

Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) is a design pattern and as such you can implement it in different ways. Keycloak provides all the necessary means to implement PEPs for different platforms, environments, and programming languages. Keycloak Authorization Services presents a RESTful API, and leverages OAuth2 authorization capabilities for fine-grained authorization using a centralized authorization server.

PEP overview

A PEP is responsible for enforcing access decisions from the Keycloak server where these decisions are taken by evaluating the policies associated with a protected resource. It acts as a filter or interceptor in your application in order to check whether or not a particular request to a protected resource can be fulfilled based on the permissions granted by these decisions.

Keycloak provides built-in support for enabling the Keycloak Policy Enforcer to Java applications with built-in support to secure JakartaEE-compliant frameworks and web containers. If you are using Maven, you should configure the following dependency to your project:

<dependency>
    <groupId>org.keycloak</groupId>
    <artifactId>keycloak-policy-enforcer</artifactId>
    <version>${keycloak.version}</version>
</dependency>

When you enable the policy enforcer all requests sent to your application are intercepted and access to protected resources will be granted depending on the permissions granted by Keycloak to the identity making the request.

Policy enforcement is strongly linked to your application’s paths and the resources you created for a resource server using the Keycloak Administration Console. By default, when you create a resource server, Keycloak creates a default configuration for your resource server so you can enable policy enforcement quickly.

Configuration

Edit this section Report an issue

The policy enforcer configuration uses a JSON format and most of the time you don’t need to set anything if you want to automatically resolve the protected paths based on the resources available from your resource server.

If you want to manually define the resources being protected, you can use a slightly more verbose format:

{
  "enforcement-mode" : "ENFORCING",
  "paths": [
    {
      "path" : "/users/*",
      "methods" : [
        {
          "method": "GET",
          "scopes" : ["urn:app.com:scopes:view"]
        },
        {
          "method": "POST",
          "scopes" : ["urn:app.com:scopes:create"]
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

The following is a description of each configuration option:

  • enforcement-mode

    Specifies how policies are enforced.

    • ENFORCING

      (default mode) Requests are denied by default even when no policy is associated with a given resource.

    • PERMISSIVE

      Requests are allowed even when no policy is associated with a given resource.

    • DISABLED

      Completely disables the evaluation of policies and allows access to any resource. When enforcement-mode is DISABLED, applications are still able to obtain all permissions granted by Keycloak through the Authorization Context

  • on-deny-redirect-to

    Defines a URL where a client request is redirected when an "access denied" message is obtained from the server. By default, the adapter responds with a 403 HTTP status code.

  • path-cache

    Defines how the policy enforcer should track associations between paths in your application and resources defined in Keycloak. The cache is needed to avoid unnecessary requests to a Keycloak server by caching associations between paths and protected resources.

    • lifespan

      Defines the time in milliseconds when the entry should be expired. If not provided, default value is 30000. A value equal to 0 can be set to completely disable the cache. A value equal to -1 can be set to disable the expiry of the cache.

    • max-entries

      Defines the limit of entries that should be kept in the cache. If not provided, default value is 1000.

  • paths

    Specifies the paths to protect. This configuration is optional. If not defined, the policy enforcer discovers all paths by fetching the resources you defined to your application in Keycloak, where these resources are defined with URIS representing some paths in your application.

    • name

      The name of a resource on the server that is to be associated with a given path. When used in conjunction with a path, the policy enforcer ignores the resource’s URIS property and uses the path you provided instead.

    • path

      (required) A URI relative to the application’s context path. If this option is specified, the policy enforcer queries the server for a resource with a URI with the same value. Currently a very basic logic for path matching is supported. Examples of valid paths are:

      • Wildcards: /*

      • Suffix: /*.html

      • Sub-paths: /path/*

      • Path parameters: /resource/{id}

      • Exact match: /resource

      • Patterns: /{version}/resource, /api/{version}/resource, /api/{version}/resource/*

    • methods

      The HTTP methods (for example, GET, POST, PATCH) to protect and how they are associated with the scopes for a given resource in the server.

      • method

        The name of the HTTP method.

      • scopes

        An array of strings with the scopes associated with the method. When you associate scopes with a specific method, the client trying to access a protected resource (or path) must provide an RPT that grants permission to all scopes specified in the list. For example, if you define a method POST with a scope create, the RPT must contain a permission granting access to the create scope when performing a POST to the path.

      • scopes-enforcement-mode

        A string referencing the enforcement mode for the scopes associated with a method. Values can be ALL or ANY. If ALL, all defined scopes must be granted in order to access the resource using that method. If ANY, at least one scope should be granted in order to gain access to the resource using that method. By default, enforcement mode is set to ALL.

    • enforcement-mode

      Specifies how policies are enforced.

      • ENFORCING

        (default mode) Requests are denied by default even when there is no policy associated with a given resource.

      • DISABLED

    • claim-information-point

      Defines a set of one or more claims that must be resolved and pushed to the Keycloak server in order to make these claims available to policies. See Claim Information Point for more details.

  • lazy-load-paths

    Specifies how the adapter should fetch the server for resources associated with paths in your application. If true, the policy enforcer is going to fetch resources on-demand accordingly with the path being requested. This configuration is specially useful when you do not want to fetch all resources from the server during deployment (in case you have provided no paths) or in case you have defined only a sub set of paths and want to fetch others on-demand.

  • http-method-as-scope

    Specifies how scopes should be mapped to HTTP methods. If set to true, the policy enforcer will use the HTTP method from the current request to check whether or not access should be granted. When enabled, make sure your resources in Keycloak are associated with scopes representing each HTTP method you are protecting.

  • claim-information-point

    Defines a set of one or more global claims that must be resolved and pushed to the Keycloak server in order to make these claims available to policies. See Claim Information Point for more details.

Claim Information Point

Edit this section Report an issue

A Claim Information Point (CIP) is responsible for resolving claims and pushing these claims to the Keycloak server in order to provide more information about the access context to policies. They can be defined as a configuration option to the policy-enforcer in order to resolve claims from different sources, such as:

  • HTTP Request (parameters, headers, body, etc)

  • External HTTP Service

  • Static values defined in configuration

  • Any other source by implementing the Claim Information Provider SPI

When pushing claims to the Keycloak server, policies can base decisions not only on who a user is but also by taking context and contents into account, based on who, what, why, when, where, and which for a given transaction. It is all about Contextual-based Authorization and how to use runtime information in order to support fine-grained authorization decisions.

Obtaining information from the HTTP request

Here are several examples showing how you can extract claims from an HTTP request:

keycloak.json
{
  "paths": [
    {
      "path": "/protected/resource",
      "claim-information-point": {
        "claims": {
          "claim-from-request-parameter": "{request.parameter['a']}",
          "claim-from-header": "{request.header['b']}",
          "claim-from-cookie": "{request.cookie['c']}",
          "claim-from-remoteAddr": "{request.remoteAddr}",
          "claim-from-method": "{request.method}",
          "claim-from-uri": "{request.uri}",
          "claim-from-relativePath": "{request.relativePath}",
          "claim-from-secure": "{request.secure}",
          "claim-from-json-body-object": "{request.body['/a/b/c']}",
          "claim-from-json-body-array": "{request.body['/d/1']}",
          "claim-from-body": "{request.body}",
          "claim-from-static-value": "static value",
          "claim-from-multiple-static-value": ["static", "value"],
          "param-replace-multiple-placeholder": "Test {keycloak.access_token['/custom_claim/0']} and {request.parameter['a']}"
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

Obtaining information from an external HTTP service

Here are several examples showing how you can extract claims from an external HTTP Service:

keycloak.json
{
  "paths": [
    {
      "path": "/protected/resource",
      "claim-information-point": {
        "http": {
          "claims": {
            "claim-a": "/a",
            "claim-d": "/d",
            "claim-d0": "/d/0",
            "claim-d-all": [
              "/d/0",
              "/d/1"
            ]
          },
          "url": "http://mycompany/claim-provider",
          "method": "POST",
          "headers": {
            "Content-Type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded",
            "header-b": [
              "header-b-value1",
              "header-b-value2"
            ],
            "Authorization": "Bearer {keycloak.access_token}"
          },
          "parameters": {
            "param-a": [
              "param-a-value1",
              "param-a-value2"
            ],
            "param-subject": "{keycloak.access_token['/sub']}",
            "param-user-name": "{keycloak.access_token['/preferred_username']}",
            "param-other-claims": "{keycloak.access_token['/custom_claim']}"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

Static claims

keycloak.json
{
  "paths": [
    {
      "path": "/protected/resource",
      "claim-information-point": {
        "claims": {
          "claim-from-static-value": "static value",
          "claim-from-multiple-static-value": ["static", "value"]
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

Claim information provider SPI

The Claim Information Provider SPI can be used by developers to support different claim information points in case none of the built-ins providers are enough to address their requirements.

For example, to implement a new CIP provider you need to implement org.keycloak.adapters.authorization.ClaimInformationPointProviderFactory and ClaimInformationPointProvider and also provide the file META-INF/services/org.keycloak.adapters.authorization.ClaimInformationPointProviderFactory in your application`s classpath.

Example of org.keycloak.adapters.authorization.ClaimInformationPointProviderFactory:

public class MyClaimInformationPointProviderFactory implements ClaimInformationPointProviderFactory<MyClaimInformationPointProvider> {

    @Override
    public String getName() {
        return "my-claims";
    }

    @Override
    public void init(PolicyEnforcer policyEnforcer) {

    }

    @Override
    public MyClaimInformationPointProvider create(Map<String, Object> config) {
        return new MyClaimInformationPointProvider(config);
    }
}

Every CIP provider must be associated with a name, as defined above in the MyClaimInformationPointProviderFactory.getName method. The name will be used to map the configuration from the claim-information-point section in the policy-enforcer configuration to the implementation.

When processing requests, the policy enforcer will call the MyClaimInformationPointProviderFactory.create method in order to obtain an instance of MyClaimInformationPointProvider. When called, any configuration defined for this particular CIP provider (via claim-information-point) is passed as a map.

Example of ClaimInformationPointProvider:

public class MyClaimInformationPointProvider implements ClaimInformationPointProvider {

    private final Map<String, Object> config;

    public MyClaimInformationPointProvider(Map<String, Object> config) {
        this.config = config;
    }

    @Override
    public Map<String, List<String>> resolve(HttpFacade httpFacade) {
        Map<String, List<String>> claims = new HashMap<>();

        // put whatever claim you want into the map

        return claims;
    }
}

Obtaining the authorization context

Edit this section Report an issue

When policy enforcement is enabled, the permissions obtained from the server are available through org.keycloak.AuthorizationContext. This class provides several methods you can use to obtain permissions and ascertain whether a permission was granted for a particular resource or scope.

Obtaining the Authorization Context in a Servlet Container

    HttpServletRequest request = // obtain javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest
    AuthorizationContext authzContext = (AuthorizationContext) request.getAttribute(AuthorizationContext.class.getName());
The authorization context helps give you more control over the decisions made and returned by the server. For example, you can use it to build a dynamic menu where items are hidden or shown depending on the permissions associated with a resource or scope. 
if (authzContext.hasResourcePermission("Project Resource")) {
    // user can access the Project Resource
}

if (authzContext.hasResourcePermission("Admin Resource")) {
    // user can access administration resources
}

if (authzContext.hasScopePermission("urn:project.com:project:create")) {
    // user can create new projects
}

The AuthorizationContext represents one of the main capabilities of Keycloak Authorization Services. From the examples above, you can see that the protected resource is not directly associated with the policies that govern them.

Consider some similar code using role-based access control (RBAC):

if (User.hasRole('user')) {
    // user can access the Project Resource
}

if (User.hasRole('admin')) {
    // user can access administration resources
}

if (User.hasRole('project-manager')) {
    // user can create new projects
}

Although both examples address the same requirements, they do so in different ways. In RBAC, roles only implicitly define access for their resources. With Keycloak, you gain the capability to create more manageable code that focuses directly on your resources whether you are using RBAC, attribute-based access control (ABAC), or any other BAC variant. Either you have the permission for a given resource or scope, or you do not have that permission.

Now, suppose your security requirements have changed and in addition to project managers, PMOs can also create new projects.

Security requirements change, but with Keycloak there is no need to change your application code to address the new requirements. Once your application is based on the resource and scope identifier, you need only change the configuration of the permissions or policies associated with a particular resource in the authorization server. In this case, the permissions and policies associated with the Project Resource and/or the scope urn:project.com:project:create would be changed.

Using the AuthorizationContext to obtain an Authorization Client Instance

The AuthorizationContext can also be used to obtain a reference to the Authorization Client API configured to your application:

    ClientAuthorizationContext clientContext = ClientAuthorizationContext.class.cast(authzContext);
    AuthzClient authzClient = clientContext.getClient();

In some cases, resource servers protected by the policy enforcer need to access the APIs provided by the authorization server. With an AuthzClient instance in hands, resource servers can interact with the server in order to create resources or check for specific permissions programmatically.

JavaScript integration

Edit this section Report an issue

The Keycloak Server comes with a JavaScript library you can use to interact with a resource server protected by a policy enforcer. This library is based on the Keycloak JavaScript adapter, which can be integrated to allow your client to obtain permissions from a Keycloak Server.

You can obtain this library from a running a Keycloak Server instance by including the following script tag in your web page:

<script src="http://.../js/keycloak-authz.js"></script>

Next, you can create a KeycloakAuthorization instance as follows:

const keycloak = ... // obtain a Keycloak instance from keycloak.js library
const authorization = new KeycloakAuthorization(keycloak);

The keycloak-authz.js library provides two main features:

  • Obtain permissions from the server using a permission ticket, if you are accessing a UMA protected resource server.

  • Obtain permissions from the server by sending the resources and scopes the application wants to access.

In both cases, the library allows you to easily interact with both resource server and Keycloak Authorization Services to obtain tokens with permissions your client can use as bearer tokens to access the protected resources on a resource server.

Handling authorization responses from a UMA-Protected resource server

If a resource server is protected by a policy enforcer, it responds to client requests based on the permissions carried along with a bearer token. Typically, when you try to access a resource server with a bearer token that is lacking permissions to access a protected resource, the resource server responds with a 401 status code and a WWW-Authenticate header.

HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
WWW-Authenticate: UMA realm="${realm}",
    as_uri="https://${host}:${port}/realms/${realm}",
    ticket="016f84e8-f9b9-11e0-bd6f-0021cc6004de"

See UMA Authorization Process for more information.

What your client needs to do is extract the permission ticket from the WWW-Authenticate header returned by the resource server and use the library to send an authorization request as follows:

// prepare a authorization request with the permission ticket
const authorizationRequest = {};
authorizationRequest.ticket = ticket;

// send the authorization request, if successful retry the request
Identity.authorization.authorize(authorizationRequest).then(function (rpt) {
    // onGrant
}, function () {
    // onDeny
}, function () {
    // onError
});

The authorize function is completely asynchronous and supports a few callback functions to receive notifications from the server:

  • onGrant: The first argument of the function. If authorization was successful and the server returned an RPT with the requested permissions, the callback receives the RPT.

  • onDeny: The second argument of the function. Only called if the server has denied the authorization request.

  • onError: The third argument of the function. Only called if the server responds unexpectedly.

Most applications should use the onGrant callback to retry a request after a 401 response. Subsequent requests should include the RPT as a bearer token for retries.

Obtaining entitlements

The keycloak-authz.js library provides an entitlement function that you can use to obtain an RPT from the server by providing the resources and scopes your client wants to access.

Example about how to obtain an RPT with permissions for all resources and scopes the user can access
authorization.entitlement('my-resource-server-id').then(function (rpt) {
    // onGrant callback function.
    // If authorization was successful you'll receive an RPT
    // with the necessary permissions to access the resource server
});
Example about how to obtain an RPT with permissions for specific resources and scopes
authorization.entitlement('my-resource-server', {
    "permissions": [
        {
            "id" : "Some Resource"
        }
    ]
}).then(function (rpt) {
    // onGrant
});

When using the entitlement function, you must provide the client_id of the resource server you want to access.

The entitlement function is completely asynchronous and supports a few callback functions to receive notifications from the server:

  • onGrant: The first argument of the function. If authorization was successful and the server returned an RPT with the requested permissions, the callback receives the RPT.

  • onDeny: The second argument of the function. Only called if the server has denied the authorization request.

  • onError: The third argument of the function. Only called if the server responds unexpectedly.

Authorization request

Both authorize and entitlement functions accept an authorization request object. This object can be set with the following properties:

  • permissions

    An array of objects representing the resource and scopes. For instance:

    const authorizationRequest = {
   "permissions": [
       {
           "id" : "Some Resource",
           "scopes" : ["view", "edit"]
       }
   ]
}

  • metadata

    An object where its properties define how the authorization request should be processed by the server.

    • response_include_resource_name

      A boolean value indicating to the server if resource names should be included in the RPT’s permissions. If false, only the resource identifier is included.

    • response_permissions_limit

      An integer N that defines a limit for the amount of permissions an RPT can have. When used together with rpt parameter, only the last N requested permissions will be kept in the RPT

  • submit_request

    A boolean value indicating whether the server should create permission requests to the resources and scopes referenced by a permission ticket. This parameter will only take effect when used together with the ticket parameter as part of a UMA authorization process.

Obtaining the RPT

If you have already obtained an RPT using any of the authorization functions provided by the library, you can always obtain the RPT as follows from the authorization object (assuming that it has been initialized by one of the techniques shown earlier):

const rpt = authorization.rpt;

Configuring TLS/HTTPS

Edit this section Report an issue

When the server is using HTTPS, ensure your policy enforcer is configured as follows:

{
  "truststore": "path_to_your_trust_store",
  "truststore-password": "trust_store_password"
}

The configuration above enables TLS/HTTPS to the Authorization Client, making possible to access a Keycloak Server remotely using the HTTPS scheme.

It is strongly recommended that you enable TLS/HTTPS when accessing the Keycloak Server endpoints.